[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160708135939.GX13335@soda.linbit>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:59:39 +0200
From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC] block: fix blk_queue_split() resource exhaustion
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:24:24PM +0600, Pavel Goran wrote:
> Friday, July 8, 2016, 7:00:35 PM, you wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 07:39:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >> I think we just might be in violent agreement.
>
> > I thought so, too :-)
>
> > Should I merge both patches,
> > rename to ".queue" and ".tmp",
> > and submit for inclusion?
>
> Could you please *not* use ".tmp"? I have a feeling it's even worse than "X"
> and "Y". :)
>
> I suggest to leave it as ".recursion", or maybe use something like
> ".downstream".
"Naming is hard" :-)
.recursion and .queue, then,
because .remainder does no longer fit.
Also, what about "Cc: Stable"?
The patch does not strictly fall into the "stable" rules,
(too many lines...).
But it should go there anyways, I think.
I'll just add those tags, and wait for the heat?
Lars Ellenberg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists