lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:21:51 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, ACPI List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@....com>, Sunil <sunil.vl@....com>, PrashanthPrakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>, Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) On 08/07/16 15:47, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:10:50PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle >> (LPI) on ARM64. >> >> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> >> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 18 +++++++ >> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > I would split this patch in two (ARM64 cpuidle and PSCI) Agreed, I combined it to get it functional in one go, but until we have 6/6, it won't work. So better to split that changes. > and for > the PSCI code (apologies, blame taken, it is entirely my fault) I > think that the code in v6 was better, I asked you to factor out > DT/ACPI idle states count and parameter retrieval but the end result > is much more complicated than what it was in v6, so for PSCI ACPI > idle states parsing I would revert to v6, apologies. > Yes I agree it got bit complicated. I will revert back to v6 for that part. > With changes above: > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> > Thanks -- Regards, Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists