lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160708141429.05d542cd@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 14:14:29 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:07:50 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>  +			 * Get the bios in the request so we can re-queue them.
>  +			 */
> - 			if (shadow[j].request->cmd_flags &
> - 					(REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA | REQ_DISCARD | REQ_SECURE)) {
> ++			if (req_op(shadow[j].request) == REQ_OP_FLUSH ||
> ++			    req_op(shadow[j].request) == REQ_OP_DISCARD ||
> ++			    req_op(shadow[j].request) == REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE ||
> ++			    shadow[j].request->cmd_flags & REQ_FUA)) {
                                                                  ^
That is an extra ')' which I have now removed.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ