linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] [REVIEW-REQUEST] [v4] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
	mgorman@...hsingularity.net, hughd@...gle.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [REVIEW-REQUEST] [v4] System Calls for Memory
 Protection Keys

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016, Dave Hansen wrote:

> I'm resending these because Ingo has said that he'd "love to have
> some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI extensions."
> The only changes to the code in months have been in the selftests.
> So, if anyone has been putting off taking a look at these, I'd
> appreciate a look now.

Please expect nothing from me.  I've paid no attention to memory
protection keys, and they're way off my radar of interest.  Sorry,
if I spend my time looking at stuff I have little to contribute to,
then I'm left with no time at all for what I should really be doing.

Hugh