[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57804973.4050306@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:46:43 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
Cc: Erin Lo <erin.lo@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] clk: fix initial state of critical clock's
parents
On 07/08/2016 04:32 PM, Michael Turquette wrote:
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 820a939fb6bb..70efe4c4e0cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -2449,8 +2449,14 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(orphan, tmp2, &clk_orphan_list, child_node) {
> struct clk_core *parent = __clk_init_parent(orphan);
>
> - if (parent)
> - clk_core_reparent(orphan, parent);
> + /*
> + * we could call __clk_set_parent, but that would result in a
> + * reducant call to the .set_rate op, if it exists
Did you mean .set_parent op?
> + */
> + if (parent) {
> + __clk_set_parent_before(orphan, parent);
> + __clk_set_parent_after(orphan, parent, NULL);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists