lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-8e546bfafb3121ed25c73a0c02311ec58459344a@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jul 2016 10:53:26 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Zhao Lei <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, zhaolei@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/cpuacct: Use loop to consolidate code in
 cpuacct_stats_show()

Commit-ID:  8e546bfafb3121ed25c73a0c02311ec58459344a
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8e546bfafb3121ed25c73a0c02311ec58459344a
Author:     Zhao Lei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:37:19 +0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 13:56:15 +0200

sched/cpuacct: Use loop to consolidate code in cpuacct_stats_show()

In cpuacct_stats_show() we currently we have copies of similar code,
for each cpustat(system/user) variant.

Use a loop instead to consolidate the code. This will also work better
if we extend the CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS type.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b0597d4224655e9f333f1a6224ed9654c7d7d36a.1466415271.git.zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
index 74241eb..677cd1a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
@@ -243,27 +243,26 @@ static int cpuacct_percpu_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *V)
 static int cpuacct_stats_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
 {
 	struct cpuacct *ca = css_ca(seq_css(sf));
+	s64 val[CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS];
 	int cpu;
-	s64 val = 0;
+	int stat;
 
+	memset(val, 0, sizeof(val));
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct kernel_cpustat *kcpustat = per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpustat, cpu);
-		val += kcpustat->cpustat[CPUTIME_USER];
-		val += kcpustat->cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
-	}
-	val = cputime64_to_clock_t(val);
-	seq_printf(sf, "%s %lld\n", cpuacct_stat_desc[CPUACCT_STAT_USER], val);
+		u64 *cpustat = per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpustat, cpu)->cpustat;
 
-	val = 0;
-	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct kernel_cpustat *kcpustat = per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpustat, cpu);
-		val += kcpustat->cpustat[CPUTIME_SYSTEM];
-		val += kcpustat->cpustat[CPUTIME_IRQ];
-		val += kcpustat->cpustat[CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ];
+		val[CPUACCT_STAT_USER]   += cpustat[CPUTIME_USER];
+		val[CPUACCT_STAT_USER]   += cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
+		val[CPUACCT_STAT_SYSTEM] += cpustat[CPUTIME_SYSTEM];
+		val[CPUACCT_STAT_SYSTEM] += cpustat[CPUTIME_IRQ];
+		val[CPUACCT_STAT_SYSTEM] += cpustat[CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ];
 	}
 
-	val = cputime64_to_clock_t(val);
-	seq_printf(sf, "%s %lld\n", cpuacct_stat_desc[CPUACCT_STAT_SYSTEM], val);
+	for (stat = 0; stat < CPUACCT_STAT_NSTATS; stat++) {
+		seq_printf(sf, "%s %lld\n",
+			   cpuacct_stat_desc[stat],
+			   cputime64_to_clock_t(val[stat]));
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ