lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1468048382.32358.81.camel@buserror.net>
Date:	Sat, 09 Jul 2016 02:13:02 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
To:	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc32: fix check_io_access()

On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 14:01 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On processors like the 8xx, the machine check exception can also
> happen directly on the load/store instruction itself, so that case
> needs to be handled as well
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> ---

What machine checks are happening that this is handling?  Is there still 8xx
code that probes for registers that might not be there?

-Scott

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ