linux-kernel - Re: Update the maximum depth of C-state from 6 to 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160710163755.769fea16@lwn.net>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:37:55 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	"baolex.ni" <baolex.ni@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Update the maximum depth of C-state from 6 to 9

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 09:55:10 +0800
"baolex.ni" <baolex.ni@...el.com> wrote:

> Currently, CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX has been defined as 10 in the cpuidle head file,
> and max_cstate = CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX – 1, so 9 is the right maximum depth of C-state.
> This change is reflected in one place of the kernel-param file,
> but not in the other place where I suggest changing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>

So why are there two signoffs on a single-line patch?  Which one of you
is the actual author?

Thanks,

jon