[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160711063730.GA5284@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:37:31 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...riel.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov@...tuozzo.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
bywxiaobai@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add a new field to struct shrinker
On Sat 09-07-16 04:43:31, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
> Struct shrinker does not have a field to uniquely identify the shrinkers
> it represents. It would be helpful to have a new field to hold names of
> shrinkers. This information would be useful while analyzing their
> behavior using tracepoints.
This will however increase the vmlinux size even when no tracing is
enabled. Why cannot we simply print the name of the shrinker callbacks?
>
> ---
> include/linux/shrinker.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> index 4fcacd9..431125c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct shrinker {
> unsigned long (*scan_objects)(struct shrinker *,
> struct shrink_control *sc);
>
> + const char *name;
> int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
> long batch; /* reclaim batch size, 0 = default */
> unsigned long flags;
> --
> 2.7.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists