lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a5d86b6-9f1a-a6cf-8af4-ef6bf3936996@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:14:31 +0800
From:	Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] KVM: x86: dynamic kvm_apic_map

On 2016/7/11 15:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 08:07, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>>      mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.apic_map_lock);
>>>
>>> +    kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
>>> +        if (kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
>>> +            max_id = max(max_id, kvm_apic_id(vcpu->arch.apic));
>>> +
>>> +    new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_apic_map) +
>>> +                  sizeof(struct kvm_lapic *) * (max_id + 1),
>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +
>>
>> I think this may cause the host runs out of memory if a malicious guest
>> did follow thing:
>> 1. vcpu a is doing apic map recalculation.
>> 2. vcpu b write the apic id with 0xff
>> 3. then vcpu b enable the x2apic: in kvm_lapic_set_base(), we will set
>> apic_base to new value before reset the apic id.
>> 4. vcpu a may see the x2apic enabled in vcpu b plus an old apic
>> id(0xff), and max_id will become (0xff >> 24).
>
> The bug is not really here but in patch 6---but you're right nevertheless!
>
> I guess the easiest solution is to replace kvm_apic_id with a field in
> struct kvm_lapic, which is already shifted right by 24 in xAPIC mode.

Or we can just simply put the assignment of apic_base to the end.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index fdc05ae..9c69059 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -1745,7 +1745,6 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
value)
                 return;
         }

-       vcpu->arch.apic_base = value;

         /* update jump label if enable bit changes */
         if ((old_value ^ value) & MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE) {
@@ -1753,7 +1752,6 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
value)
                         static_key_slow_dec_deferred(&apic_hw_disabled);
                 else
                         static_key_slow_inc(&apic_hw_disabled.key);
-               recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);
         }

         if ((old_value ^ value) & X2APIC_ENABLE) {
@@ -1764,6 +1762,8 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
value)
                         kvm_x86_ops->set_virtual_x2apic_mode(vcpu, false);
         }

+       vcpu->arch.apic_base = value;
+       recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);
         apic->base_address = apic->vcpu->arch.apic_base &
                              MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BASE;


btw, i noticed that there is no apic map recalculation after turn off 
the x2apic mode.Is it correct?

-- 
best regards
yang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ