linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to use proper unit address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160711103345.GB5503@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:33:45 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
Cc:	robh+dt@...nel.org, tony@...mide.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	paul@...an.com, t-kristo@...com, mturquette@...libre.com,
	sboyd@...eaurora.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, vigneshr@...com, nsekhar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to
 use proper unit address

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:56:23AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
> > > Replace unit address from 0 to the proper physical address. Also insure
> > > that the unit address matches the reg property address.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 8 ++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I applied this long ago but never let you know: Applied, thanks.
> 
> Actually I didn't. And it seems the reason is that it doesn't apply
> cleanly. For some reason my tree doesn't have an entry for the ecap
> example on am437x. Am I missing a patch? Can you resend whatever is
> not in linux-next yet?

Oh, nevermind my blabbering, it took me too long to realize that this is
the series that Tony had picked up for the most part, and I hadn't
properly marked it done in patchwork.

I'll go get some coffee now.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)