[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160711103829.GB17735@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:38:30 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Peng Fan <van.freenix@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: arm-smmu: use devm_request_irq and devm_free_irq
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:32:55AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 04/07/16 10:38, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Use devm_request_irq to simplify error handling path,
> > when probe smmu device.
> >
> > Also devm_{request|free}_irq when init or destroy domain context.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@...il.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> > ---
> [...]
> > @@ -2050,7 +2046,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_err(dev, "removing device with active domains!\n");
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_global_irqs; ++i)
> > - free_irq(smmu->irqs[i], smmu);
> > + devm_free_irq(smmu->dev, smmu->irqs[i], smmu);
>
> There shouldn't be any need for this at all, since the very next thing
> called after drv->remove() is devres_release_all().
I already sent a pull request for this, so any further changes will need
to be sent as incremental patches.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists