linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/panel: Add JDI LT070ME05000 WUXGA DSI Panel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGWqDJ4FVBSgHwL_7Y0pQU4CwgxTLq6qOq981G-ke9Kwr3YpkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:01:22 +0530
From:	Vinay Simha <simhavcs@...il.com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Cc:	Archit Taneja <archit.taneja@...il.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/panel: Add JDI LT070ME05000 WUXGA DSI Panel

emil,

As you had suggested to drop the spurious returns in
jdi_panel_unprepare and drop the return itself.
But as i had mentioned earlier , we cannot drop the return function
and void for jdi_panel_unprepare , since the drm fun* requires int as
return type (drm_panel_funcs .unprepare).

please do re-point out if i had still missed anything.

fyi,
v7:
 * emil review comments incorporated
   added ARRAY_SIZE in struct, regulator_bulk_disable in poweroff,
   gpios checks dropped.
   some returns cannot be dropped, since drm panel framework return
   type required.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 11:52:11PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 28 June 2016 at 16:59, Vinay Simha <simhavcs@...il.com> wrote:
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > Any further comments or reviews?
>> >
>> You still haven't covered my earlier suggestions, as such I cannot
>> give you a r-b :-( They are not blockers by any means, but it'll be
>> up-to the maintainer to ack/pick this up.
>>
>> Thierry ?
>
> Vinay, please address Emil's comments and resend. I also see that you
> stopped sending the device tree bindings patch at some point. Please do
> include that when you repost as I don't seem to be able to find a recent
> version anywhere.
>
> Thierry



-- 
Regards,

Vinay Simha.B.N.