[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160711144706.GA27013@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:47:06 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, cf@...k-chips.com,
huangtao@...k-chips.com, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/perf: arm-pmu: Handle per-interrupt affinity
mask
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:37:16AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 03:33:47PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On a big-little system, PMUs can be wired to CPUs using per CPU
> > interrups (PPI). In this case, it is important to make sure that
> > the enable/disable do happen on the right set of CPUs.
> >
> > So instead of relying on the interrupt-affinity property, we can
> > use the actual percpu affinity that DT exposes as part of the
> > interrupt specifier. The DT binding is also updated to reflect
> > the fact that the interrupt-affinity property shouldn't be used
> > in that case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> > ---
> > * From v1:
> > - propagate the error if irq_get_percpu_devid_partition fails
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt | 4 +++-
>
> I acked v1, please add acks.
This is queued in arm64/for-next/core, but I spotted your Ack and added
it when I sent the patch to Catalin.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists