linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 15/32] x86/mm: Improve stack-overflow #PF handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <6ec969dbe40e32a004d4ef6da623bab4881411f7.1468270393.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:53:48 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 15/32] x86/mm: Improve stack-overflow #PF handling

If we get a page fault indicating kernel stack overflow, invoke
handle_stack_overflow().  To prevent us from overflowing the stack
again while handling the overflow (because we are likely to have
very little stack space left), call handle_stack_overflow() on the
double-fault stack

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h |  6 ++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c      |  6 +++---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c          | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h
index c3496619740a..01fd0a7f48cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ extern void ist_exit(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void ist_begin_non_atomic(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void ist_end_non_atomic(void);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
+void __noreturn handle_stack_overflow(const char *message,
+				      struct pt_regs *regs,
+				      unsigned long fault_address);
+#endif
+
 /* Interrupts/Exceptions */
 enum {
 	X86_TRAP_DE = 0,	/*  0, Divide-by-zero */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index f0345284c30b..33d4e7629a42 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -293,9 +293,9 @@ DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_SS,     SIGBUS,  "stack segment",		stack_segment)
 DO_ERROR(X86_TRAP_AC,     SIGBUS,  "alignment check",		alignment_check)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
-static void __noreturn handle_stack_overflow(const char *message,
-					     struct pt_regs *regs,
-					     unsigned long fault_address)
+__visible void __noreturn handle_stack_overflow(const char *message,
+						struct pt_regs *regs,
+						unsigned long fault_address)
 {
 	printk(KERN_EMERG "BUG: stack guard page was hit at %p (stack is %p..%p)\n",
 		 (void *)fault_address, current->stack,
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index ca44e2e7fd00..76c58fdcfb29 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -753,6 +753,40 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		return;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
+	/*
+	 * Stack overflow?  During boot, we can fault near the initial
+	 * stack in the direct map, but that's not an overflow -- check
+	 * that we're in vmalloc space to avoid this.
+	 */
+	if (is_vmalloc_addr((void *)address) &&
+	    (((unsigned long)tsk->stack - 1 - address < PAGE_SIZE) ||
+	     address - ((unsigned long)tsk->stack + THREAD_SIZE) < PAGE_SIZE)) {
+		register void *__sp asm("rsp");
+		unsigned long stack =
+			this_cpu_read(orig_ist.ist[DOUBLEFAULT_STACK]) -
+			sizeof(void *);
+		/*
+		 * We're likely to be running with very little stack space
+		 * left.  It's plausible that we'd hit this condition but
+		 * double-fault even before we get this far, in which case
+		 * we're fine: the double-fault handler will deal with it.
+		 *
+		 * We don't want to make it all the way into the oops code
+		 * and then double-fault, though, because we're likely to
+		 * break the console driver and lose most of the stack dump.
+		 */
+		asm volatile ("movq %[stack], %%rsp\n\t"
+			      "call handle_stack_overflow\n\t"
+			      "1: jmp 1b"
+			      : "+r" (__sp)
+			      : "D" ("kernel stack overflow (page fault)"),
+				"S" (regs), "d" (address),
+				[stack] "rm" (stack));
+		unreachable();
+	}
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * 32-bit:
 	 *
-- 
2.7.4