linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 12/32] x86/dumpstack/64: Handle faults when printing the "Stack:" part of an OOPS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8230a6f98a1646041c783350e099994bf2ccfcc4.1468270393.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:53:45 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 12/32] x86/dumpstack/64: Handle faults when printing the "Stack:" part of an OOPS

If we overflow the stack into a guard page, we'll recursively fault
when trying to dump the contents of the guard page.  Use
probe_kernel_address so we can recover if this happens.

Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index a81e1ef73bf2..6dede08dd98b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 	stack = sp;
 	for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) {
+		unsigned long word;
+
 		if (stack >= irq_stack && stack <= irq_stack_end) {
 			if (stack == irq_stack_end) {
 				stack = (unsigned long *) (irq_stack_end[-1]);
@@ -283,12 +285,18 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		if (kstack_end(stack))
 			break;
 		}
+
+		if (probe_kernel_address(stack, word))
+			break;
+
 		if ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0) {
 			if (i != 0)
 				pr_cont("\n");
-			printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, *stack++);
+			printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, word);
 		} else
-			pr_cont(" %016lx", *stack++);
+			pr_cont(" %016lx", word);
+
+		stack++;
 		touch_nmi_watchdog();
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
-- 
2.7.4