linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/pci: Use MRFLD abbreviation for Merrifield

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1468321462-136016-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:04:22 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/pci: Use MRFLD abbreviation for Merrifield

Everywhere in the kernel the MRFLD is used as abbreviation of Intel Merrifield.
Do the same in intel_mid_pci.c module.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c b/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c
index 5413d6a..5a18aed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
 #define PCIE_CAP_OFFSET	0x100
 
 /* Quirks for the listed devices */
-#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFL_MMC	0x1190
-#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFL_HSU	0x1191
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFLD_MMC	0x1190
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFLD_HSU	0x1191
 
 /* Fixed BAR fields */
 #define PCIE_VNDR_CAP_ID_FIXED_BAR 0x00	/* Fixed BAR (TBD) */
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int intel_mid_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 			 * Skip HS UART common registers device since it has
 			 * IRQ0 assigned and not used by the kernel.
 			 */
-			if (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFL_HSU)
+			if (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFLD_HSU)
 				return -EBUSY;
 			/*
 			 * TNG has IRQ0 assigned to eMMC controller. But there
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int intel_mid_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 			 * eMMC gets it. The rest of devices still could be
 			 * enabled without interrupt line being allocated.
 			 */
-			if (dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFL_MMC)
+			if (dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_MRFLD_MMC)
 				return 0;
 		}
 		break;
-- 
2.8.1