linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:19:07 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-metag@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
	freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs

On 07/12/2016 02:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:23:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> This is fifth approach for replacing struct dma_attrs with unsigned
>> long.
>>
>> The main patch (1/44) doing the change is split into many subpatches
>> for easier review (2-42).  They should be squashed together when
>> applying.
> 
> For all the drm driver patches:
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> 
> Should I pull these in through drm-misc, or do you prefer to merge them
> through a special topic branch (with everything else) instead on your own?
> -Daniel

Thanks. I saw today that Andrew Morton applied the patchset so I think
he will handle it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof