[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160712125243.GA8597@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:52:43 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vlevenetz@...sol.com, vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org,
alex.elder@...aro.org, johan@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [Query] Preemption (hogging) of the work handler
On Tue 2016-07-12 18:38:05, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (07/11/16 15:35), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> [..]
> > Sometimes, the platform doesn't come back after suspend. I have tried
> > enabling no-console-suspend and the last line it prints is:
> >
> > Disabling non-boot CPUs
I guess that the printk() kthread is not longer scheduled when there
is only one CPU left.
> > And nothing after that at all. We have to forcefully reboot the phone
> > after that. Moving the prints to they synchronous way (using
> > echo 1 > /sys/module/printk/parameters/synchronous), fixes that issue.
>
> hm... I'll take a look.
We might try to explicitly flush the consoles in suspend_console().
But I am not sure if we always want to do so because it might take
a while. Also it need not help if someone already owns the
console_sem. Note the console_unlock() calls the cond_resched()
when in safe context.
Well, we might do the best effort when no_console_suspend is enabled.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists