[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160712152319.GG22183@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:23:19 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: ACPI List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Vikas Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sunil <sunil.vl@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] arm64: cpuidle: drop __init section marker to
arm_cpuidle_init
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:07:54PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Commit ea389daa7fd9 ("arm64: cpuidle: add __init section marker to
> arm_cpuidle_init") added the __init annotation to arm_cpuidle_init
> as it was not needed after booting which was correct at that time.
>
> However with the introduction of ACPI LPI support, this will be used
> from cpuhotplug path in ACPI processor driver.
>
> This patch drops the __init annotation from arm_cpuidle_init to avoid
> the following warning:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x113c8): Section mismatch in reference from the
> function acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe() to the function
> .init.text:arm_cpuidle_init()
> The function acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe() references
> the function __init arm_cpuidle_init().
> This is often because acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of arm_cpuidle_init is wrong.
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists