lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:49:58 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Odd performance results

On 07/12/16 08:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:55:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 07:43:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 07:17:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 July 2016 06:26:39 CEST, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> So I ran a quick benchmark which showed stair-step results.  I
>>>>> immediately
>>>>> thought "Ah, this is due to CPU 0 and 1, 2 and 3, 4 and 5, and 6 and 7
>>>>> being threads in a core."  Then I thought "Wait, this is an x86!"
>>>>> Then I dumped out cpu*/topology/thread_siblings_list, getting the
>>>>> following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 	cpu0/topology/thread_siblings_list: 0-1
>>>>> 	cpu1/topology/thread_siblings_list: 0-1
>>>>> 	cpu2/topology/thread_siblings_list: 2-3
>>>>> 	cpu3/topology/thread_siblings_list: 2-3
>>>>> 	cpu4/topology/thread_siblings_list: 4-5
>>>>> 	cpu5/topology/thread_siblings_list: 4-5
>>>>> 	cpu6/topology/thread_siblings_list: 6-7
>>>>> 	cpu7/topology/thread_siblings_list: 6-7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm guessing this is an AMD bulldozer like machine?
>>>
>>> /proc/cpuinfo thinks otherwise:
>>>
>>> processor	: 0
>>> vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
>>> cpu family	: 6
>>> model		: 60
>>> model name	: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710MQ CPU @ 2.50GHz
>>
>> Weird, I've never seen an Intel box do that before... hpa, any idea? or
>> is this just one weird BIOS.
> 
> ;-)
> 
> It is a Lenovo W541 laptop, for whatever that might be worth.  Roughly
> on year old.
> 

Well, the obvious thing here is that CPUs 0-1, 2-3, 4-5, and 6-7 *are*
indeed threads in a core... Intel x86 products have supported
multithreading since the Pentium 4.  So the "wait, this is an x86!" bit
is strange to me.

The CPU in question (and /proc/cpuinfo should show this) has four cores
with a total of eight threads.  The "siblings" and "cpu cores" fields in
/proc/cpuinfo should show the same thing.  So I am utterly confused
about what is unexpected here?

Also, you mentioned absolutely nothing about what kind of benchmark it
was, or what the "stairstepping" results imply, so it doesn't really
make it any easier...

	-hpa

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ