lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57852E3D.6010107@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:51:57 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v5 13/32] x86/mm/64: In
 vmalloc_fault(), use CR3 instead of current->active_mm

On 07/11/2016 01:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> If we get a vmalloc fault while current->active_mm->pgd doesn't
> match CR3, we'll crash without this change.  I've seen this failure
> mode on heavily instrumented kernels with virtually mapped stacks.

When does this happen, btw?  Crossing page boundaries on the stack
between the time we swap mm's and the time we switch stacks?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ