linux-kernel - Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Mark functions with the _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:23:59 -0400
From:	Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>
To:	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
Cc:	PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, minipli@...linux.so,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
	"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Mark functions with the
 __nocapture attribute

On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:08 -0400, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > The nocapture gcc attribute can be on functions only.
> > The attribute takes one or more unsigned integer constants as
> > parameters
> > that specify the function argument(s) of const char* type to
> > initify.
> > If the marked argument is a vararg then the plugin initifies
> > all vararg arguments.
> 
> Why is this called "nocapture"? Not captured by what? It seems like
> it
> means "initify this if possible". Am I misunderstanding its purpose?

It means they don't escape via that function, i.e. they aren't stored
anywhere to be used in any way after the call.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (852 bytes)