[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160712222029.GW1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:20:29 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Cc: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fpga-manager: Add Socfpga Arria10 support
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 02:31:05PM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com> wrote:
> > + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "no clock specified\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "could not enable clock\n");
> > + clk_put(priv->clk);
>
> Seen that you used devm_clk_get() is this one necessary?
That's actually a bug. Never clk_put() a devm_clk_get()'d clock.
devm_clk_put() is what you want if provided. However, I think
this clk_put() call is useless here.
> > +static int socfpga_a10_fpga_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct fpga_manager *mgr = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + struct a10_fpga_priv *priv = mgr->priv;
> > +
> > + fpga_mgr_unregister(&pdev->dev);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> > + clk_put(priv->clk);
>
> Same here, if needed at all shouldn't it be devm_clk_put() ?
And also useless here, as the whole point of the devm_* stuff is to
clean up the resources that were claimed on probe failure or when
the device is unbound from its driver.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists