linux-kernel - [PATCH 39/66] perf test bpf: Use epoll_wait() instead of epoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1468363241-14555-40-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:40:14 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 39/66] perf test bpf: Use epoll_wait() instead of epoll_pwait()

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

The prototype for epoll_wait() is available in older distros, so use it
instead of epoll_pwait() (removing the last NULL arg, the sigmask,
makes it the same thing anyway) to avoid breaking the build.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-pwiwizloxt0jujy8em80qut3@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c | 4 ++--
 tools/perf/tests/bpf.c                | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
index 0ec9c2c03164..e53bc91fa260 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = {
 	.max_entries = 1,
 };
 
-SEC("func=sys_epoll_pwait")
-int bpf_func__sys_epoll_pwait(void *ctx)
+SEC("func=sys_epoll_wait")
+int bpf_func__sys_epoll_wait(void *ctx)
 {
 	int ind =0;
 	int *flag = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&flip_table, &ind);
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index da0d87613975..fc54064b9186 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -13,13 +13,13 @@
 
 #ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
 
-static int epoll_pwait_loop(void)
+static int epoll_wait_loop(void)
 {
 	int i;
 
 	/* Should fail NR_ITERS times */
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++)
-		epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
+		epoll_wait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static struct {
 		"[basic_bpf_test]",
 		"fix 'perf test LLVM' first",
 		"load bpf object failed",
-		&epoll_pwait_loop,
+		&epoll_wait_loop,
 		(NR_ITERS + 1) / 2,
 	},
 #ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
-- 
2.7.4