[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57847278.8000408@iommu.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:30:48 +0800
From: Wan Zongshun <vw@...mu.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
jason@...edaemon.net, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARM: NUC900: Add nuc970 machine support
On 2016年07月12日 00:04, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2016 3:27:21 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote:
>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SOC_NUC970),)
>> obj-y := irq.o time.o mfp.o gpio.o clock.o
>> obj-y += clksel.o dev.o cpu.o
>> +endif
>> # W90X900 CPU support files
>
> When mfp.o is disabled like this, I get a link error in two drivers
> using the exported interface:
>
> ERROR: "mfp_set_groupg" [drivers/spi/spi-nuc900.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "mfp_set_groupi" [drivers/input/keyboard/w90p910_keypad.ko] undefined!
Why remove mfp modules? this multifunction pin driver should be used for
those two drivers, if no mfp_set_groupX, I don't think driver can work.
Now mfp has standard driver subsystem?
>
> Any idea for a better migration strategy?
>
> Arnd
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists