[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABAubTiVb8j8wEbcr16FAJnBxxS7QzghpPiJUcmV+=Ji=QgL=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:57:50 -0700
From: Shayan Pooya <shayan@...eve.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, koct9i@...il.com,
cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another
process in the same cgroup
> Yep. Bug still not fixed in upstream. In our kernel I've plugged it with
> this:
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2808,8 +2808,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible void schedule_tail(struct
> task_struct *prev)
> balance_callback(rq);
> preempt_enable();
>
> - if (current->set_child_tid)
> - put_user(task_pid_vnr(current), current->set_child_tid);
> + if (current->set_child_tid &&
> + put_user(task_pid_vnr(current), current->set_child_tid))
> + force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
> }
I just verified that with your patch there is no hung processes and I
see processes getting SIGSEGV as expected.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists