[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160713084813.GH9806@techsingularity.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:48:13 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/34] mm, vmscan: make shrink_node decisions more
node-centric
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:32:34AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:34:49AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Earlier patches focused on having direct reclaim and kswapd use data that
> > is node-centric for reclaiming but shrink_node() itself still uses too
> > much zone information. This patch removes unnecessary zone-based
> > information with the most important decision being whether to continue
> > reclaim or not. Some memcg APIs are adjusted as a result even though
> > memcg itself still uses some zone information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>
> Second half of the memcg conversion is in the next patch. Ok.
Yeah. I know it bumps the patch count but the combined patch is a headache
to read.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists