[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160713113657.GV32247@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:36:57 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Silvan Jegen <s.jegen@...il.com>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...ashfs.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Squashfs: silence some uninitialized variable warnings
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:29:32PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Dan Carpenter
> <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > We print these values in the TRACE() code before we check that
> > fill_meta_index() was successful. It makes my static checker complain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/squashfs/file.c b/fs/squashfs/file.c
> > index 13d8094..46679e2 100644
> > --- a/fs/squashfs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/squashfs/file.c
> > @@ -334,9 +334,9 @@ failed:
> > */
> > static int read_blocklist(struct inode *inode, int index, u64 *block)
> > {
> > - u64 start;
> > + u64 start = -1;
>
> Do you assign the negative value to the unsigned variable here on purpose?
>
Yeah. It's just a garbage value but hopefully it would stand out in the
printk.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists