lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:07:03 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc:	Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC v2] PM / hibernate: Introduce snapshot test mode for hibernation

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> This mode is used to verify if the snapshot data written to
> the swap device can be successfully restored to the memory. It
> is useful to ease the debugging process on hibernation,
> since this mode can not only bypass the BIOSen/bootloader,
> but also the system re-initialization.
>
> For example:
> $ sudo echo snapshot > /sys/power/pm_test
> $ sudo echo disk > /sys/power/state
>
> [  267.959784] PM: Image saving progress:  80%
> [  268.038669] PM: Image saving progress:  90%
> [  268.111745] PM: Image saving progress: 100%
> [  268.129269] PM: Image saving done.
> [  268.133485] PM: Wrote 518612 kbytes in 0.75 seconds (691.48 MB/s)
> [  268.140564] PM: S|
> [  268.160067] hibernation debug: Waiting for 5 seconds.
> ...
> [  273.508638] PM: Looking for hibernation image.
> [  273.516583] PM: Image signature found, resuming
> [  273.926547] PM: Loading and decompressing image data (129653 pages)...
> [  274.122452] PM: Image loading progress:   0%
> [  274.322127] PM: Image loading progress:  10%
> ...
>
> Rebased on top of linux-next.
>
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> ---
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  kernel/power/main.c      |  3 +++
>  kernel/power/power.h     |  3 +++
>  kernel/power/swap.c      |  7 +++++++
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> index 51441d8..30cc5b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static char resume_file[256] = CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION;
>  dev_t swsusp_resume_device;
>  sector_t swsusp_resume_block;
>  __visible int in_suspend __nosavedata;
> +static int software_resume(void);
>
>  enum {
>         HIBERNATION_INVALID,
> @@ -647,7 +648,7 @@ static void power_down(void)
>   */
>  int hibernate(void)
>  {
> -       int error, nr_calls = 0;
> +       int error, nr_calls = 0, snapshot_test = 0;

Why can't snapshot_test be a bool variable?

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ