[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gu7pfjNhzdO1x5D3coHzvZKepLBS=X4G0wjKVkhBxSGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:22:58 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vlevenetz@...sol.com,
Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>,
Alex Elder <alex.elder@...aro.org>, johan@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Query] Preemption (hogging) of the work handler
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
>
> On (07/13/16 14:05), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [..]
>> > ah, just saw this. OK, very close to what I sent in another thread, so I
>> > guess it will work on your side.
>> > let me know if it doesn't, I'll fold it into 0001 and re-spin the series.
>> > thanks for your help!
>>
>> But you need to do an analogous thing for hibernation. Essentially,
>> wherever disable_nonboot_cpus() is called.
>
> hibernation() suspends console, and suspend_console() forces printk to
> switch to sync mode. resume_console() lets printk to operate in async
> mode (if printk was configured to operate in async mode at all).
>
> the patch I'm talking about is:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146838876027364&w=2
Ah OK. That should work for hibernation too.
> am I missing something?
No, I got confused for some reason.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists