[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160713210857.GA9511@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:08:57 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>,
Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Severe performance regression w/ 4.4+ on Android due to cgroup
locking changes
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:57:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:52:11PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Not a particularly real-time-friendly fix, but certainly a good check
> > on our various assumptions.
>
> Not only RT, but also HPC and all the other RDMA userspace polling
> freaks ;-)
If Tejun's lglock-like approach doesn't pan out, then it would quite
easy to make a boot parameter that selected expedited vs. non-expedited
behavior.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists