[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5787490F.5000105@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:10:55 +0200
From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, rt@...utronix.de,
Richard Cochran <rcochran@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 43/67] leds/trigger/cpu: Convert to hotplug state machine
On 07/14/2016 09:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com> wrote:
>
>>> @@ -133,7 +125,13 @@ static int __init ledtrig_cpu_init(void)
>>> }
>>>
>>> register_syscore_ops(&ledtrig_cpu_syscore_ops);
>>> - register_cpu_notifier(&ledtrig_cpu_nb);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * FIXME: Why needs this to happen in the interrupt disabled
>>> + * low level bringup phase of a cpu?
>>> + */
>>
>> Why wasn't it possible to clarify the issue before the
>> submission?
>
> Nothing has been applied yet (this submission is part of the clarification
> process), are you fine with this conversion as-is, with a separate patch doing any
> followup fixes - or would you prefer another approach?
>
> This CPU hotplug series tries to do straightforward conversions to the CPU hotplug
> state machine without changing behavior - while pointing out any problems that
> were found along the way.
>
> I agree that the addition of this FIXME should probably have been pointed out in
> the changelog as well, but this patch was submitted once already with no feedback
> received - and that's the historic pattern with such types of series: only a low
> percentage of all driver maintainers replies so we have to be proactive to a
> certain degree to have a chance of improving core kernel infrastructure. It's
> better to add FIXMEs with open questions that to introduce subtle problems.
Thanks for the explanation. I'm OK with that approach.
Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists