lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <57874B68.8060300@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:20:56 +0800
From:	xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/pvqspinlock: restore/set vcpu_hashed state after
 failing adaptive locking spinning



On 2016年07月14日 15:53, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>
> When the lock holder vCPU is racing with the queue head:
>
>     CPU 0 (lock holder)    CPU1 (queue head)
>     ===================    =================
>     spin_lock();           spin_lock();
>      pv_kick_node();        pv_wait_head_or_lock();
>                              if (!lp) {
>                               lp = pv_hash(lock, pn);
> 							 xchg(&l->locked, _Q_SLOW_VAL);
> 							}
> 						    WRITE_ONCE(pn->state, vcpu_halted);
>       cmpxchg(&pn->state,
>        vcpu_halted, vcpu_hashed);
>       WRITE_ONCE(l->locked, _Q_SLOW_VAL);
>       (void)pv_hash(lock, pn);
>
> In this case, lock holder inserts the pv_node of queue head into the
> hash table and set _Q_SLOW_VAL unnecessary. This patch avoids it by
> restoring/setting vcpu_halted state after failing adaptive locking
> spinning.
>

good catching. this is hash entry leak.

After apply Waiman's pathset "locking/pvqspinlock: Fix missed PV wakeup & support PPC", this is not the big problem.
But we can still save another cmpxchg.

So
Reviewed-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
> ---
>   kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> index 21ede57..ac7d20b 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
>   				goto gotlock;
>   			}
>   		}
> -		WRITE_ONCE(pn->state, vcpu_halted);
> +		WRITE_ONCE(pn->state, vcpu_hashed);
>   		qstat_inc(qstat_pv_wait_head, true);
>   		qstat_inc(qstat_pv_wait_again, waitcnt);
>   		pv_wait(&l->locked, _Q_SLOW_VAL);
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ