linux-kernel - Re: [v5 PATCH 1/5] extcon: Add Type-C and DP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <5786E795.6040504@samsung.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:15:01 +0900
From:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:	Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>, dianders@...omium.org,
	tfiga@...omium.org, heiko@...ech.de, yzq@...k-chips.com,
	groeck@...omium.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, wulf@...k-chips.com,
	marcheu@...omium.org
Cc:	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5 PATCH 1/5] extcon: Add Type-C and DP support

Hi Chris,

[snip]

>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Chanwoo Choi
>>> There are 4 modes for Type-C DP alt mode:
>>> 1) USB host only  :
>>>
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, 1);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB, 0);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_DISP_DP, 0);
>>>
>>> 2) USB device only
>>>
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, 0);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB, 1);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_DISP_DP, 0);
>>>
>>> 3) DP only
>>>
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, 0);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB, 0);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_DISP_DP, 1);
>>>
>>> 4) USB + DP
>>>
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB_HOST, 1);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_USB, 0);
>>> extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_DISP_DP, 1);
>>>
>>>
>>> for 3rd mode: DP only, there is only EXTCON_DISP_DP is attached, the EXTCON_USB_HOST
>>> and EXTCON_USB are detached, Can I set the property into these 2 detached cable?
>>> or just call extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_DISP_DP, EXTCON_PROP_TYPEC_POLARITY, 0 or 1);
>> I'm thinking to solve this issue. In result, we can add one more type to specific connector.
>> For EXTCON_DISP_DP, we can add the two type as following. And EXTCON_PROP_TYPEC_POLARITY property
>> should be added to EXTCON_TYPE_USB.
>>
>> +    [EXTCON_DISP_DP] = {
>> +        .type = EXTCON_TYPE_DISP | EXTCON_TYPE_USB,
>> +        .id = EXTCON_DISP_DP,
>> +        .name = "DP",
>> +    },
>>
>> So, as you mentioned, EXTCON_DISP_DP can set the EXTCON_PROP_TYPEC_POLARITY property as following:
>> - extcon_set_cable_state(edev, EXTCON_DISP_DP, EXTCON_PROP_TYPEC_POLARITY, 0 or 1);
>>
>> I'll again developing the extcon property.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>>
> Nice idea, But I am thinking about is it compatible with real DisplayPort without Type-C.
> Maybe we should add a new cable: EXTCON_DISP_DP_ALT
> 
> +    [EXTCON_DISP_DP] = {
> +        .type = EXTCON_TYPE_DISP,
> +        .id = EXTCON_DISP_DP,
> +        .name = "DP",
> +    },
> 
> +    [EXTCON_DISP_DP_ALT] = {
> +        .type = EXTCON_TYPE_DISP | EXTCON_TYPE_USB,
> +        .id = EXTCON_DISP_DP,
> +        .name = "DP ALT",
> +    },

EXTCON_DISP_DP_ALT means EXTCON_DISP_DP connector with EXTCON_PROP_TYPEC_POLARITY property.
So, we can explain the DP alternative mode without EXTCON_DISP_DP_ALT.

I'm wondering to add the new EXTCON_DISP_DP_ALT connector
because alternative mode was defined as mode instead of new h/w connector type.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi