[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f189511-4432-8208-28f0-701f1d05e91e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:33:50 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jmattson@...gle.com, pfeiner@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: nVMX: maintain internal copy of current VMCS
On 14/07/2016 02:16, David Matlack wrote:
> KVM maintains L1's current VMCS in guest memory, at the guest physical
> page identified by the argument to VMPTRLD. This makes hairy
> time-of-check to time-of-use bugs possible,as VCPUs can be writing
> the the VMCS page in memory while KVM is emulating VMLAUNCH and
> VMRESUME.
>
> The spec documents that writing to the VMCS page while it is loaded is
> "undefined". Therefore it is reasonable to load the entire VMCS into
> an internal cache during VMPTRLD and ignore writes to the VMCS page
> -- the guest should be using VMREAD and VMWRITE to access the current
> VMCS.
>
> To adhere to the spec, KVM should flush the current VMCS during VMPTRLD,
> and the target VMCS during VMCLEAR (as given by the operand to VMCLEAR).
> Since this implementation of VMCS caching only maintains the the current
> VMCS, VMCLEAR will only do a flush if the operand to VMCLEAR is the
> current VMCS pointer.
>
> KVM will also flush during VMXOFF, which is not mandated by the spec,
> but also not in conflict with the spec.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
This is a good change. There is another change that is possible on top:
with this change you don't need current_vmcs12/current_vmcs12_page at
all, I think. You can just use current_vmptr and kvm_read/write_guest
to write back the VMCS12, possibly the cached variants.
Of course this would just be a small simplification, so I'm applying the
patch as is to kvm/next.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists