[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+Cwnr22sbsYWo+y9Epn8cUgMQghvnLMuY8B6Nf32zp2ukQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:28:45 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/pvqspinlock: restore/set vcpu_hashed state
after failing adaptive locking spinning
2016-07-14 19:26 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:15:56PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> In this case, lock holder inserts the pv_node of queue head into the
>> hash table and set _Q_SLOW_VAL unnecessary. This patch avoids it by
>> restoring/setting vcpu_halted state after failing adaptive locking
> ^^^^^^
>> spinning.
>>
>
>> - WRITE_ONCE(pn->state, vcpu_halted);
>> + WRITE_ONCE(pn->state, vcpu_hashed);
> ^^^^^^
>
> The Changelog meant so say vcpu_hashed, surely?
Oh, there is a typo in changelog, I will fix it.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists