lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:54:27 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/34] mm, vmscan: Have kswapd reclaim from all zones if
 reclaiming and buffer_heads_over_limit

On 07/08/2016 11:35 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The buffer_heads_over_limit limit in kswapd is inconsistent with direct
> reclaim behaviour. It may force an an attempt to reclaim from all zones and
> then not reclaim at all because higher zones were balanced than required
> by the original request.
>
> This patch will causes kswapd to consider reclaiming from all zones if
> buffer_heads_over_limit.  However, if there are eligible zones for the
> allocation request that woke kswapd then no reclaim will occur even if
> buffer_heads_over_limit. This avoids kswapd over-reclaiming just because
> buffer_heads_over_limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ