linux-kernel - Re: Severe performance regression w/ 4.4+ on Android due to cgroup locking changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160714152433.GM15005@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:24:33 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>,
	Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Severe performance regression w/ 4.4+ on Android due to cgroup
 locking changes

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:07:15AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:20:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > If that's the case, we have the wrong implemention
> > > for percpu-rwsem where very long delays for writers induce the same
> > > level of delays to all readers.  If expedited by default isn't
> > > workable, we should move away from rcu_sync for percpu_rwsem.
> > 
> > Just because your usecase doesn't like it, doesn't mean its not good.
> > Its a perfectly fine implementation for uprobes for example. The
> > addition/removal of uprobes is extremely rare, as global writers should
> > be.
> >
> > And no, the writer delay isn't observed by the readers, those will
> > continue 'undisturbed' for most of it.
> 
> How?  While write lock is pending, no new reader is allowed.  If
> reader ops are high frequency, they will surely get affected.  It just
> isn't a good design to inject RCU grace period synchronously into a
> hot path.

Oops, right, the grace period is just used to switch the lock to
global mode while readers are passing through.  Never mind this point.
It's purely about writer latency then.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun