[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160714155849.GA120073@google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 08:58:49 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@...tec.de>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"Cooper Jr., Franklin" <fcooper@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: omap2: add missing braces
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:53:48AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A bug fix just introduced incorrect behavior in the omap2 nand driver, as
> found by gcc-6.1:
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c: In function 'omap_get_dt_info':
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c:1658:2: error: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
> if (!info->elm_of_node)
> ^~
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c:1660:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
> if (!info->elm_of_node)
> ^~
>
> We clearly need to put the indented code into { } braces to get the intended
> behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: 3bbca2c54f86 ("mtd: nand: omap2: Add check for old elm binding")
Wow, can't believe I missed that. Squashed into the original patch.
Thanks,
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists