linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALAqxLWbqo3ha5oOvrdpR0VCfxugSuWknrGXTbEu+DE9Y0kFGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:01:27 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@...lrox.com>,
	Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@...gle.com>,
	Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...roid.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>,
	Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>,
	Elliott Hughes <enh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] proc: Add /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 7/14/2016 5:48 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>> Can someone give a detailed explanation of what you could do with
>> the new timerslack feature and compare it to what you can do with
>> sys_nice?
>>
>
> what you can do with the timerslack feature is add upto 4 seconds of extra
> time/delay on top of each select()/poll()/nanosleep()/... (basically
> anything that
> uses hrtimers on behalf of the user), and then also control within that
> 4 second window exactly when that extra delay ends
> (which may help a timing attack kind of scenario)

So the interface actually allows for 64bits of nanoseconds, so more or
less infinite delay if nothing else is happening.

thanks
-john