[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c8a2159-ea79-efdd-9a6b-c49e0267b477@colorfullife.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:40:08 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, 1vier1@....de,
felixh@...ormatik.uni-bremen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ipc/sem.c: sem_lock fixes
Hi Andrew,
On 07/14/2016 12:05 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:06:50 +0200 Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew, Hi Peter,
>>
>> next version of the sem_lock() fixes:
>> The patches are again vs. tip.
>>
>> Patch 1 is ready for merging, Patch 2 is for review.
>>
>> - Patch 1 is the patch as in -next since January
>> It fixes the race that was found by Felix.
>> - Patch 2 removes the memory barriers that are part of the qspinlock
>> code.
>> - (The hysteresis patch would be patch 3. The risk of regressions
>> can't be ruled out, thus it must wait for benchmarks from real
>> workload tests)
> I think you're saying that if these two patches cause performance
> regressions, we will need ipc-sem-sem_lock-with-hysteresis.patch?
No, the two patches will not cause any regressions.
Commit 6062a8dc051 ("ipc,sem: fine grained locking for semtimedop") was
a huge scalability improvement for 99% of the users, but introduced a
regression for one workload.
Noone complained about it, so the workload must be rare.
Patch 3 now fixes the regression.
But we live with the introduced regression for 3 years, so give me (and
Davidlohr, and anyone else who wants to support) some more time.
Also on my TODO list: The queue merge/unmerge logic, i.e. commit
f269f40ad5ae ("ipc/sem.c: always use only one queue for alter
operations") might also win from some hysteresis.
My proposal:
- patch 1: merge towards main tree.
- patch 2: needs update. The barrier in sem_lock() is required. I'm not
yet sure about complexmode_enter(), perhaps with #ifndef
CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
- patch 3 should wait.
--
Manfred
Powered by blists - more mailing lists