[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1607141504110.72383@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
cc: mpatocka@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org, okozina@...hat.com,
jmarchan@...hat.com, skozina@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: System freezes after OOM
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Whether the OOM reaper will free some memory no longer matters. Instead,
> whether the OOM reaper will let the OOM killer select next OOM victim matters.
>
> Are you aware that the OOM reaper will let the OOM killer select next OOM
> victim (currently by clearing TIF_MEMDIE)? Clearing TIF_MEMDIE in 4.6 occurred
> only when OOM reaping succeeded. But we are going to change the OOM reaper
> always clear TIF_MEMDIE in 4.8 (or presumably change the OOM killer not to
> depend on TIF_MEMDIE) so that the OOM reaper guarantees that the OOM killer
> always selects next OOM victim.
>
That's cute, I'll have to look into those patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists