[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160714221437.GF3057@ubuntu>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:14:37 -0700
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vlevenetz@...sol.com, vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org,
alex.elder@...aro.org, johan@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Query] Preemption (hogging) of the work handler
On 14-07-16, 16:55, Jan Kara wrote:
> Agree on that - but that seems to be a problem of a particular wakeup
> implementation of the 3.10 kernel Viresh is using, not a problem of the
> upstream kernel.
I think we can get it to trigger on mainline as well. Also to mention that I
also don't see it on every suspend. Probably hrtimer_active() call returns true
in the sequence somewhere earlier, and we don't have to go activate a hrtimer.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists