linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powernv: Use __printf in pe_level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1468558752.8745.52.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 21:59:12 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powernv: Use __printf in pe_level_printk

On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 14:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
> 
> > 
> > Make the compiler detect format and argument mismatches.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> > index 3a97990..1c1a586 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> > @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ extern void pnv_pci_dma_bus_setup(struct pci_bus
> > *bus);
> >  extern int pnv_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nvec, int
> > type);
> >  extern void pnv_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  
> > +__printf(3, 4)
> >  extern void pe_level_printk(const struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, const
> > char *level,
> >  			    const char *fmt, ...);
> Thanks, but it breaks the build due to lots of new warnings.
> 
> We'll have to fix those before merging it.

Good.  Are you going to fix those?

I thought I did a powerpc defconfig build of arch/powerpc/
and I believe it finished without error, but I'm pleased
it found some defects.

I think it's now marked "rejected" in patchwork.
Perhaps it'd better to mark it "deferred" instead.