| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CADyBb7t8AqMuU3ABsAeD9ZaQY_khzz87p-sG+O0J7x0tnap74Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:33:36 +0800
From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
rruigrok@...eaurora.org, harba@...eaurora.org,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
wei@...hat.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kvalo@...eaurora.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver
Hi Rafael,
On 14 July 2016 at 04:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, <fu.wei@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for parsing arch timer in GTDT,
>>> provides some kernel APIs to parse all the PPIs and
>>> always-on info in GTDT and export them.
>>>
>>> By this driver, we can simplify arm_arch_timer drivers, and
>>> separate the ACPI GTDT knowledge from it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 ++
>>> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig | 15 ++++
>>> drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++
>>> 6 files changed, 198 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>>> index b7e2e77..1cdc7d2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>>> @@ -521,4 +521,9 @@ config XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION
>>>
>>> endif
>>>
>>> +if ARM64
>>> +source "drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig"
>>> +
>>> +endif
>>> +
>>> endif # ACPI
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>>> index 251ce85..1a94ff7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>>> @@ -99,5 +99,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_EXTLOG) += acpi_extlog.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CRC_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic_crc.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic_xpower.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += arm64/
>>>
>>> video-objs += acpi_video.o video_detect.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..ff5c253
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>>> +#
>>> +# ACPI Configuration for ARM64
>>> +#
>>> +
>>> +menu "The ARM64-specific ACPI Support"
>>> +
>>> +config ACPI_GTDT
>>> + bool "ACPI GTDT table Support"
>>
>> This should depend on ARM64.
>>
>> Also I wonder if it needs to be user-selectable? Wouldn't it be
>> better to enable it by default when building for ARM64 with ACPI?
>>
>>> + help
>>> + GTDT (Generic Timer Description Table) provides information
>>> + for per-processor timers and Platform (memory-mapped) timers
>>> + for ARM platforms. Select this option to provide information
>>> + needed for the timers init.
>>> +
>>> +endmenu
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..466de6b
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
>>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT) += acpi_gtdt.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..9ee977d
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * ARM Specific GTDT table Support
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2016, Linaro Ltd.
>>> + * Author: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>>> + * Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
>>> + * Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
>>> +
>>> +#undef pr_fmt
>>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "GTDT: " fmt
>>
>> I would add "ACPI" to the prefix too if I were you, but that's me.
>>
>>> +
>>> +typedef struct {
>>> + struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt;
>>> + void *platform_timer_start;
>>> + void *gtdt_end;
>>> +} acpi_gtdt_desc_t;
>>> +
>>> +static acpi_gtdt_desc_t acpi_gtdt_desc __initdata;
>>> +
>>> +static inline void *next_platform_timer(void *platform_timer)
>>> +{
>>> + struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
>>> +
>>> + platform_timer += gh->length;
>>> + if (platform_timer < acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end)
>>> + return platform_timer;
>>> +
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +#define for_each_platform_timer(_g) \
>>> + for (_g = acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start; _g; \
>>> + _g = next_platform_timer(_g))
>>> +
>>> +static inline bool is_timer_block(void *platform_timer)
>>> +{
>>> + struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
>>> +
>>> + if (gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_TIMER_BLOCK)
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>>
>> This is just too much code. It would suffice to do
>>
>> return gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_TIMER_BLOCK;
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline bool is_watchdog(void *platform_timer)
>>> +{
>>> + struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
>>> +
>>> + if (gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_WATCHDOG)
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>>
>> Just like above.
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Get some basic info from GTDT table, and init the global variables above
>>> + * for all timers initialization of Generic Timer.
>>> + * This function does some validation on GTDT table.
>>> + */
>>> +static int __init acpi_gtdt_desc_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>>> +{
>>> + struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt = container_of(table,
>>> + struct acpi_table_gtdt,
>>> + header);
>>> +
>>> + acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt = gtdt;
>>> + acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end = (void *)table + table->length;
>>> +
>>> + if (table->revision < 2) {
>>> + pr_info("Revision:%d doesn't support Platform Timers.\n",
>>> + table->revision);
>>
>> Is it really useful to print this message (and the one below) at the
>> "info" level? What about changing them to pr_debug()?
>>
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!gtdt->platform_timer_count) {
>>> + pr_info("No Platform Timer.\n");
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start = (void *)gtdt +
>>> + gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
>
> BTW, breaking lines this way doesn't make the code particularly more readable.
>
>>> + if (acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start <
>>> + (void *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)) {
>
> Same here.
>
> It might be avoided by using a local (void *) variable "start", ie.
>
> start = (void *)gtdt + gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
> if (start < (void *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt))) {
> print message;
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start = start;
Pretty good idea, will do , thanks :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists