lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6c0b22d7-d912-fd96-c6e6-d14123ca89a3@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:45:24 +0800
From:	Songshan Gong <gongss@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC V1]s390/perf: fix 'start' address of module's map



在 7/13/2016 5:07 PM, Jiri Olsa 写道:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:39:13PM +0800, Songshan Gong wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 7/11/2016 8:01 PM, Jiri Olsa 写道:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:06:14PM +0800, Songshan Gong wrote:
>>>
>>> SNIP
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> we have following functions in tools/lib/api/fs to read
>>>>> single number from file, which I assume you do above:
>>>>>
>>>>> int sysfs__read_int(const char *entry, int *value);
>>>>> int sysfs__read_ull(const char *entry, unsigned long long *value);
>>>>>
>>>>> please check if you could use some of them,
>>>>> we could add some more generic one if needed
>>>>
>>>> It seems infeasible.
>>>> Each value in /sys/module/[module name]/sections/.text is a string like
>>>> "0x000003ff8130078\n".
>>>> But the core function 'strtoull(line, NULL, 10)' in sysfs__read_ull is based
>>>> on decimal.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you can introduce a new argument indicating the value is based on hex
>>>> or decimal, or binary?
>>>
>>> yea we could specify it directly and add something like:
>>>
>>>   int filename__read_ull(const char *filename, unsigned long long *value, int base)
>>>
>>> plus some other higher layer helpers..
>>>
>>> but I wonder if we could use the base 0 (like in the attached patch),
>>> the man page says it should be able to detect the base
>>>
>>> we'd need to check all the current usage to make sure nothing gets broken
>>>
>>> jirka
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Since your patch havn't pushed to devel branch, my next version patch will
>> still use the origin method to parse value from /sys/.
>
> I'll make/send the change during this week,
>

Oh, could you remind me after you've done?
Thanks a lot.

Song Shan Gong

> jirka
>

-- 
SongShan Gong

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ