[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <57889C23.3050106@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:17:39 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
kgene@...nel.org, mchehab@....samsung.com, andrzej.p@...sung.com,
hans.verkuil@...co.com, javier@....samsung.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: Doc add missing documentation for
samsung,exynos4212-jpeg
On 07/15/2016 10:14 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> However if these compatibles are exactly equal then
>> only one should be preferred. It makes everything easier. Second can be
>> still documented e.g. as deprecated.
>
> Still, both of them are present in the driver. Shouldn't it be reflected
> in the documentation?
Right, it is a good practice, so how about:
- compatible : should be one of:
"samsung,s5pv210-jpeg", "samsung,exynos3250-jpeg",
"samsung,exynos4210-jpeg", "samsung,exynos5420-jpeg",
"samsung,exynos5433-jpeg";
Deprecated: "samsung,exynos4212-jpeg"
(or any other formatting)
plus update to DTS changing it to 4210?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists