[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5788A521.8000207@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:56:01 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm tree
On 07/15/2016 10:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
>
> between commits:
>
> f12708965069 ("ARM: 8561/3: dma-mapping: Don't use outer_flush_range when the L2C is coherent")
> 565068221b90 ("ARM: 8561/4: dma-mapping: Fix the coherent case when iommu is used")
>
> from the arm tree and patch:
>
> "ARM: dma-mapping: use unsigned long for dma_attrs"
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks correct, thanks. FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists