[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160715104605.GO9806@techsingularity.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:46:05 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/34] mm: rename NR_ANON_PAGES to NR_ANON_MAPPED
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:13:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:37:01 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> > > I don't care strongly enough to cause a respin of half the series, and
> > > it's not your problem that I waited until the last revision went into
> > > mmots to review and comment. But if you agreed to a revert, would you
> > > consider tacking on a revert patch at the end of the series?
> > >
> >
> > In this case, I'm going to ask the other people on the cc for a
> > tie-breaker. If someone else prefers the old names then I'm happy for
> > your patch to be applied on top with my ack instead of respinning the
> > whole series.
> >
> > Anyone for a tie breaker?
>
> I am aggressively undecided. I guess as it's a bit of a 51/49
> situation, the "stay with what people are familiar with" benefit tips the
> balance toward the legacy names?
>
I still can't decide. It's currently still a draw in terms of naming. If
you're worried, use the old naming. It wouldn't be the first time I
thought a name was odd.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists